Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repositori.mypolycc.edu.my/jspui/handle/123456789/6850
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHayem A. Al Moosa-
dc.contributor.authorAbu Elnasr E. Sobaih-
dc.contributor.authorImed Zaiem-
dc.contributor.authorThamer Alzahrani-
dc.contributor.authorEya A. Zouari-
dc.contributor.authorAli Saleh Alshebami-
dc.contributor.authorHussein N. E. Edrees-
dc.contributor.authorAmer A. Al-Qutaish-
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-13T05:11:14Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-13T05:11:14Z-
dc.date.issued2025-09-11-
dc.identifier.issn2199-8531-
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100629-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.mypolycc.edu.my/jspui/handle/123456789/6850-
dc.description.abstractGrounded in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), this research explores how marketing professionals perceive AI adoption, examining the paradoxical tensions between technological fascination and professional resistance that challenge traditional TAM assumptions. This study draws on an exploratory qualitative approach involving 24 international marketing professionals (with 3–30 years of experience) from Africa, Europe, the United States, and the Gulf region. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews, using purposive sampling, and continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. Data analysis is based on a thematic content analysis method. Our analysis reveals three paradoxical perceptions (favorable, unfavorable, ambivalent) and identifies a novel five-category benefit taxonomy (technological, organizational, psychological, economic, communicational) alongside six barrier categories, challenging the linear adoption models prevalent in existing literature. The results show that professionals perceive AI primarily as a complementary tool that improves their individual performance while fundamentally transforming their profession. Theoretically, this study extends TAM by incorporating professional resistance and paradoxical adoption patterns, highlighting the limitations of linear acceptance models when applied to AI adoption within creative professional contexts. The study identifies the marketing experts’ perspectives on the future of their profession, the areas with high potential for AI impact, as well as the skills needed to remain relevant in the face of increasing integration of this technology. Practically, our findings provide a framework for managing AI adoption resistance in emerging markets and guidelines for organizations navigating the AI transformation paradox. Managerial implications are formulated to guide marketing professionals in the investment and use of AI, integrating it consistently into their daily practice.ms_IN
dc.language.isoenms_IN
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd.ms_IN
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity;11 (2025) 100629-
dc.subjectArtificial intelligencems_IN
dc.subjectAI benefitsms_IN
dc.subjectAI paradoxms_IN
dc.subjectAI resistancems_IN
dc.subjectAutomationms_IN
dc.subjectProfessional perceptionsms_IN
dc.subjectTechnology acceptance model (TAM)ms_IN
dc.subjectAI in marketingms_IN
dc.titleTHE AI PARADOX IN MARKETING: FASCINATION, RESISTANCE, AND REINVENTIONms_IN
dc.typeArticlems_IN
Appears in Collections:JABATAN PERDAGANGAN

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
The AI paradox in marketing Fascination, resistance, and reinvention.pdf735.22 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.